Melanie & Mike say... |
|
|
|
| the only Weekly Word-origin Webzine | |
Issue 56 |
October 11, 1999 |
| Search | Home | FAQ | Links | Site map | Book Store | New | Ask Us | Theory | About |
Interested in sponsoring this site, advertising here or making a donation to keep the site running? |
A few weeks ago we took a look at some woodwinds. We now turn to the origin of a few other instrument names. There are several instruments which
derive their names from the Italian tromba
meaning "trumpet".
But wait, there was another, even weirder, member of the tromba marina family. The barytone (from Greek barys, "deep" + tonos, "sound") was a tromba marina with several "sympathetic" strings inside it. These extra strings were not meant to be played, they just resonated "in sympathy" with the notes which were being played, producing a sound reminiscent of a bass sitar. The word trombone
entered English about 1724. It was borrowed from the Italian trombone The tuba, that mainstay of military and marching bands, takes its name, most appropriately, from that of a bronze war trumpet of ancient Rome. The Roman tuba, unlike the convoluted modern instrument, was a straight tube. Thus, the similarity between the words tuba and tube (from Latin tubus, "a tube") is no coincidence. Another splendid instrument of with a deep tone like the tuba was the serpent. It was about 8 feet long, made of wood covered with leather and formed with three U-shaped turns resembling a huge, black, well... serpent. This simple, if bizarre, instrument without keys eventually evolved into the brass, eleven-keyed ophicleide (from Greek ophis, "snake" + kleis, "key"). |
|
|||
|
|||
This word means, etymologically, "of the muses". It comes
from Greek
mouseion "of the muses". Mosaic is an entirely different word, etymologically and otherwise, from Mosaic with a capital M which means "of Moses". |
|||
|
From Ron MacKinnon:
It is first recorded in English in the late 14th century as testifie, having come from Late Latin testificare "to bear witness, proclaim". That word was formed from testi(s) "witness" and ficus "making". Testis comes from the Indo-European root trei- "three", with the sense of a "third person standing by (as a witness)". There is a popular notion which suggests that Latin testis "witness" is related to testis "testicle", by the idea that a testicle "bears witness" of virility. This has not been proven, and some believe that testis "testicle" is actually related to Latin testa "pot, shell". |
|||
|
From Jnotten:
Most etymological sources agree that the term drunk as a skunk arose due to its rhyme. Prior to its appearance in English there were several other drunk as a ____ phrases, some dating back to Chaucer's time. Lord was skunk's immediate predecessor, the notion there being that the rich could better afford alcoholic drink than the common folk. Some of the other forms of this simile were drunk as a an ape (14th century), as a besom (19th century), as a boiled owl (late 19th century), as David's sow (17th century), as an emperor (late 18th and early 19th century), as a fiddler (mid-19th to early 20th century), as a mouse or as a drowned mouse (14th century) and as a piper (18th century). Your Brazilian friend's explanation is interesting but seems apocryphal and there is no evidence for it in English. (Do they even drink tequila in Brazil?) By the way, the word skunk itself arose in print for the first time in 1634 as squuncke. It comes from an Abenaki (American Indian) word for the animal, segankw. Variant forms of that word occur in other American Indian dialects of the Algonquin family. It is formed from proto-Algonquin sek- "urinate" and a'kw "fox". The verb to skunk "to defeat without allowing one's opponent to score" is first recorded in 1845, and it is thought to simply come from the noun.
|
|||
|
From Terry Reeder:
This word comes from preponder, which is formed from Latin pre- "before in importance, superior to" + ponder "to weigh", giving the word the meaning "to outweigh in importance". Preponder dates from 1502 in Atkynson's De Imitatione: "He...prepondereth the gyver before all thynges gyven." Preponderance made its first appearance in writing in 1681: "Little light Boats...To the side whereof, this Fish [remora] fastening her self, might easily make it swag, as the least preponderance on either side will do." The meaning here is closer to simply "weight". The first use of the word in a more legalistic sense occurred in 1780: "The good would have an incontestible preponderance over evil." Today the word is most often heard in the courtroom phrase "preponderance of the evidence". |
|||
|
Sez
You... |
|
From Ikokuma:
Gosh, we hate to sound like pedantic curmudgeons, but your source of information on hobo's etymology is incorrect. A hobo is not "homeward bound"; he is on his way to another job. To quote the hobos' own definitions: a hobo is an itinerant worker, a tramp is an itinerant non-worker and a bum is a non-itinerant non-worker. However, we applaud your interest in etymology at such a young age and even more so your writing us! The lesson here is to carefully scrutinize sources of information. There are many anecdotal and spurious etymologies lurking out there. Beware! As we mention in the Archives, which is where you read about hobo, its etymology is unclear. (Incidentally, the material in the Archives is actually fairly old and in the process of being updated; our Back Issues are much more recent.) All we do know is that hobo originated in the late 19th century as a "new name" for a tramp. Interestingly, it was Hobo in those initial instances, and initial references to the word identify it as the tramps' new name for themselves, implying that it arose among them. |
|
From David Seeger:
Gaude, also seen as gaud, is thought to come from Latin gaudia "joy", as the first five mysteries of the rosary are called the Joyful Mysteries. Gaudy (Issue 55) is no relation. |
|
From Ezio Regolati:
This word came up in our discussion of bated breath in Issue 55. There is an alternate spelling of beiszen: beissen "to macerate, to steep in lye". While today this does, in fact, mean "to bite", it had an earlier meaning of "macerate". Though we are not students of German etymology, it seems logical that a word meaning "to soften (macerate)" could develop the meaning "to chew (soften)" and then "to bite". We can find no evidence of a German word beitzen (but we are not infallible in German, just English). |
From Jorge Potter:
We do say there is no evidence for the connection between mind your p's and q's (Issue 53) and printing (Issue 54, Sez You...); however, there is no evidence for any of the other explanations, either. They are all conjecture as the phrase has been around for quite some time. It is possible that it originated in some context unrelated to printing and was then taken up by printers. |
From Zev A. Shanken:
Yes, and as your question was pedantic, the answer happens to be so, as well. In brief, commas and other small punctuation placed within quotation marks are a convention of moveable-type printing, and as we're working with virtual type, now, we see no need for an outdated rule. See Issue 35, Curmudgeons' Corner. It seems that our rebellious streak is showing! |
From Tom Conroy:
Tolerate is possibly related to both Atlas and Tantalus by way of the Indo-European root tel#-1 "to lift, support, bear". Atlas was most certainly a Titan while Tantalus was a half-titan, being the son of Zeus, king of the gods, and a titaness called Pluto (not to be confused with the Roman god of the underworld of the same name). Apparently your dictionary is only partially wrong! 1# represents schwa. |
Comments, additions? Send to Melanie & Mike: melmike@takeourword.com
Copyright © 1995-1999 mc˛ creations
Last Updated 01/08/06 01:02 PM