Issue 196, page 4

Search Home FAQ Links Site map Book Store

BackIssues

New Ask Us Theory About
Sez You...

Do you enjoy reading Take Our Word For It?  Donate!  Just click the button.

From Hanna Szoke:

I still check it out from time to time: has Issue #196 appeared?  But no.  Will it ever appear?  I love your site!  I miss it!  Please come back. 

Thank you, Hanna, and all of those who wrote us over the past year, wondering where on (or off!) earth we were and when a new issue might appear!  We did not intend to take a year off, but that is what happened, for various and sundry reasons.  However, we are back and hope to maintain our twice-a-month schedule for TOWFI.  Stay tuned, and thanks so much for your patience.  We would not be doing this if it were not for you, our faithful readers.

Oh, and, by the way, TOWFI has been around for TEN YEARS this year!  

From Grace:

I wish to express my appreciation for your very helpful and entertaining site.

You recently responded to a question and explained the origin of the phrase pardon/excuse my French and said that it was first used in Harper's Magazine in 1895.  I would like too add that apparently it was used publicly even earlier.  In the collection of essays Early Stages: Theatre in Ontario 1800-1914, Robertson Davies claims that the phrase was first used publicly in the popular American stage play The Mighty Dollar by Benjamin E. Woolf in 1875.  According to Mr. Davies this same play introduced the North American public to the slang term PDQ and popularized the little-known expression OK.

Thank you again for providing a wonderful site!

And thank you for providing this information!   We (and the OED) love hearing about usage that predates what we currently know about a word or phrase.  We'll be researching this one (can't just take Mr. Davies' word without doing a little research to back it up) and will update you soon.

From Anna Kendall:

I stumbled on your site, and I was very happy to do so.  Therefore, perhaps it is mean of me to point out what I consider to be bad English: the tautological "exact same" in the following sentence.

The noun wake comes from the exact same source as the verb.

Perhaps you consider it to be acceptable given that it is so commonly used.  Perhaps if I researched the phrase I'd find it one of antiquity.  Perhaps it grates on my sensibilities just because my parents hated it so much.

One thing I know for sure, I pounced on it, priding myself on finding it on your (otherwise) lovely site.

Yes, we have quite a few readers who pore over our site, looking for similar problems, ready to pounce and bring them to our attention.  It's only fair!  And we do own up to our mistakes (well, sometimes!).  Exact same is indeed repetitious, at best.  In this instance we have let some of our dialectical speech creep into our written work.  Other examples of such usage, which Mike (Welsh) catches Melanie (Texan) employing, are big giant and little baby used as adjectives, as in "Look at that big giant dog eating that little baby sausage".  Mike laughs every time.

From Katija Koehler:

From Kristy:

Suzanne Carpenter wrote "I understand "you all" and "you guys", but I am still mystified by "youse".  well, I didn't grow up with the term, but I live outside of and work in Philadelphia now, so I think I can answer that one.  Basically, it's used the same way that y'all is used (or is supposed to be used).  It's a plura of "you", they just added an s to the end like a lot of other plurals.  Personally, I don't like the word.  The same applies to "yuns" (a Pittsburghism).  I assume it's supposed to be "you ones", but it doesn't make as much sense to me as y'all or youse.

I grew up in Pittsburgh and while the term "yuns" (according to Kristy) is not something I have said, I have heard it my whole life.  In fact, "yuns" should be "yinz".  It is derived from the phrase "you ones" and is occasionally misused when a Pittsburgher says "yinzes" (misused because "yinz" is already plural).  Sometimes the phrase is extended to "yinz guys".  Also, the official language of Pittsburgh is Pittsburghese, there is no such thing as a "Pittsburghism".  You can find out more about Pittsburghese at www.pittsburghese.com, a website devoted to this wonderful (wink wink) dialect.

And if any of you saw the recent Robert McNeil special on PBS (in the U.S.) called Do You Speak American?, you may recall the segment on Pittsburghese.  Linguist Barbara Johnstone, speaking with McNeil, correctly identifies yins (sometimes spelled yinz in Pittsburgh) as a Scottish/ Irish word (she says "Scotch-Irish", which refers to the Scots who moved to Ireland after 1611) that is still heard in Scotland and Ireland today.  Check out the web site on the McNeil series at http://www.pbs.org/speak.  Type "yins" into the search engine at the site and you'll find more information on Pittsburghese.

There was also a segment on the Texas dialect in that series , which reminded Melanie of her favorite quote from her 95-year old grandmother.  Speaking about how much fruit she picked and canned from her garden, Grandma said, "I got five gallons o' tomaters offen two rows."  Wonderful stuff!

From Matt Tearle:

Glad to see that a new issue is on the way.  Just in case you're wanting material, I thought I'd chime in on the question in the last issue about the origin of kangaroo.  I don't claim any expertise or that I do know the answer, but I do know a couple of facts that are likely to be important.  First, there is no single Aboriginal language (as you note in your answer); indeed, there are several hundred!  Second, there are several species of kangaroo, and several species of wallaby (which would look suspiciously similar to an early European explorer).  Therefore, it seems likely that when Cook arrived and said "What's that weird-looking thing?", he received the answer "kangaroo" from whichever tribe he asked, and in response to whatever he was pointing at.  Twenty years later, Hunter and Tench may have heard a totally different tribe describing some type of hopping marsupial that may or may not have been the same beast as that of Cook.  whatever the case, it is wrong to think that there is one "correct" word for "members of the family Macropodidae" -- rather, it is most likely that both kangaroo and patagaran are correct, in the same way that dog, chien, and hund all describe a canine, depending on whether you speak English, French or German.  We call the beasts "kangaroos" because that was what Cook and banks first heard.

I suspect you know all this, but I didn't think it was clear from your answer (dare I be so critical?).  And the OED description certainly didn't clarify the matter.

Finally, the American Heritage dictionary claims that "recent linguistic fieldwork ... has confirmed the existence of a word gangurru in the northeast Aboriginal language of Guugu Yimidhirr, referring to a species of kangaroo".

Linguistically, however, the apparent disappearance of an Aboriginal word corresponding to kangaroo was disturbing, because it meant that kangaroo's origins could not be researched.  It was natural to suggest other explanations for kangaroo, when, even as recently as a few years ago, its Aboriginal predecessor had not been found, despite full knowledge of the existence of many different Aboriginal languages spoken in Australia.  

That being said, evidence of a word in Guugu Yumidhirr that seems to correspond to kangaroo is exciting to hear! 

From Peter van der Krogt:

http://elements.vanderkrogt.net/index.html

Thanks, Peter, what a great site that includes the origins of the names of each of the elements!  We'll add it to our Links page.

PREVIOUS  |  NEXT

Or read the last issue to see what all of these people are talking about!

Comments, additions? Send to Melanie & Mike: melmike@takeourword.com
DO NOT SEND QUERIES TO THAT ADDRESS.  Instead, ASK US.
Copyright 1995-
2004 TIERE
Last Updated 01/16/05 12:30 PM